Note carefully the following syntax restrictions, which serve to remove potential ambiguities associated with prefix operators.
P:-Q in parentheses
assert((P:-Q))
because the precedence of the infix operator :-, and hence of the
expression
P:-Q, is 1200. Enclosing the expression in parentheses reduces its
precedence to 0.
P->Q in parentheses
[(P->Q)]
because the precedence of the infix operator ->, and hence of the
expression
P->Q, is 1050. Enclosing the expression in parentheses reduces its
precedence to 0.
( must not be separated by any intervening
spaces, newlines, or other characters. Thus
point (X,Y,Z)
is invalid syntax.
(, this (
must be separated from the operator by at least one space or other
layout character. Thus
:-(p;q),r.
(where :- is the prefix operator) is invalid syntax.
The system would try to interpret it as the structure:
,
/ \
:- r
|
;
/ \
p q
That is, it would take :- to be a functor of arity 1.
However, since the arguments of a functor are required to be expressions of
precedence less than 1000, this interpretation would fail as soon
as the ; (precedence 1100) were encountered.
In contrast, the term:
:- (p;q),r.
is valid syntax and represents the following structure:
:-
|
,
/ \
; r
/ \
p q
X = (?-)
since the precedence of ?- is 1200.